Computer Systems Analysts salaries

What computer systems analysts earn nationwide, from US Department of Labor payroll data covering 519,530 people in the occupation.

What the role earns

$83K $106K median $134K 25th–75th percentile

Half of computer systems analysts nationwide earn between $82,860 and $134,110, with a median of $105,850. Bureau of Labor Statistics — employer-reported payroll, 519,530 employed nationwide · OEWS-May2025.

What sponsored roles attest

$99K $112K median $135K 25th–75th percentile

Employers sponsoring H-1B workers for this role formally committed to a median of $112,041 ($99,490–$134,684), across 4,142 certified filings in 38 states · FY2026-Q2. A narrow slice of employers rather than the market — the note at the foot of this page says who is in it — and it runs 6% above the earnings median above.

Pay by area

The 12 highest-paying of 75 areas — the rest are in the table below. Bars span the 25th–75th percentile.

San Jose-Sunnyvale-Sa…$157KSan Francisco-Oakland…$134KSeattle-Tacoma-Bellev…$134KBoston-Cambridge-Newt…$129KColorado Springs, CO$129KProvidence-Warwick, R…$129KNew York-Newark-Jerse…$128KDenver-Aurora-Centenn…$128KPortland-Vancouver-Hi…$127KWashington-Arlington-…$127KFort Collins-Loveland…$127KDallas-Fort Worth-Arl…$123K
25th–75th percentile Median

Every area we can publish

The 75 metro areas where at least 100 people work in this occupation, the federal estimate is solid enough to publish, and we track hiring locally — so each page can say something about the market and not only the wage. Each has its own page.

Area 25th Median 75th Employed
San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA $121,340 $157,140 $194,320 7,260
San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA $104,460 $134,460 $170,700 11,180
Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA $102,200 $133,690 $165,380 19,050
Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH $101,950 $129,180 $161,130 17,470
Colorado Springs, CO $101,460 $128,740 $164,700 760
Providence-Warwick, RI-MA $97,120 $128,580 $135,380 2,050
New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ $97,990 $128,340 $161,200 26,540
Denver-Aurora-Centennial, CO $102,410 $127,880 $164,070 4,190
Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA $101,720 $127,360 $149,700 4,020
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV $99,690 $127,040 $161,310 18,620
Fort Collins-Loveland, CO $100,460 $126,880 $164,910 200
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX $95,010 $122,520 $143,370 20,000
Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA $93,940 $122,330 $138,380 3,170
Bridgeport-Stamford-Danbury, CT $95,520 $121,700 $147,240 800
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA $100,960 $121,560 $140,460 16,900
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA $85,800 $119,090 $137,240 8,300
San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad, CA $99,250 $119,090 $149,290 5,760
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX $87,560 $113,440 $136,500 8,510
Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT $94,130 $112,270 $131,220 2,330
Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI $96,790 $112,090 $133,520 8,580
Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC $98,610 $110,790 $134,280 7,870
Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD $84,650 $108,980 $161,280 6,850
Raleigh-Cary, NC $84,760 $108,480 $132,710 4,530
Trenton-Princeton, NJ $80,840 $108,190 $147,500 1,130
Huntsville, AL $84,470 $107,350 $137,860 2,610
Columbus, OH $84,780 $107,230 $136,730 4,660
Durham-Chapel Hill, NC $98,180 $106,410 $129,620 2,530
Richmond, VA $86,490 $105,190 $133,180 2,990
Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL $83,980 $105,080 $134,260 7,100
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD $85,220 $105,050 $131,460 8,520
Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX $84,510 $104,590 $133,550 6,930
Ann Arbor, MI $86,440 $104,550 $124,430 1,080
Ogden, UT $81,590 $104,050 $126,690 260
Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ $79,200 $103,770 $133,160 9,330
Las Vegas-Henderson-North Las Vegas, NV $79,750 $103,760 $124,190 1,700
Virginia Beach-Chesapeake-Norfolk, VA-NC $82,730 $103,760 $134,560 2,290
Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI $84,100 $103,670 $131,980 7,150
Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL $79,060 $103,650 $129,650 9,000
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN $81,030 $103,490 $129,960 14,660
Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN $81,630 $103,450 $133,790 4,240
Charleston-North Charleston, SC $82,100 $103,300 $128,630 1,620
Jacksonville, FL $79,680 $102,230 $129,860 3,250
Milwaukee-Waukesha, WI $85,130 $102,120 $125,520 2,680
Des Moines-West Des Moines, IA $81,530 $102,070 $120,030 2,680
Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL $78,450 $101,940 $139,610 1,080
Indianapolis-Carmel-Greenwood, IN $79,320 $101,890 $130,970 5,080
Buffalo-Cheektowaga, NY $81,330 $101,660 $130,470 1,170
Kansas City, MO-KS $78,780 $101,340 $131,440 4,180
San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX $81,430 $100,840 $126,720 2,930
Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL $78,010 $100,780 $126,960 4,200
Memphis, TN-MS-AR $79,860 $100,640 $125,260 1,700
Madison, WI $77,230 $100,550 $123,240 2,140
Greenville-Anderson-Greer, SC $77,860 $99,830 $122,570 1,120
Birmingham, AL $80,450 $99,470 $122,190 1,870
Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN $78,250 $99,270 $124,990 4,500
Provo-Orem-Lehi, UT $75,380 $98,970 $118,100 540
Pittsburgh, PA $78,610 $98,550 $111,840 5,230
Salt Lake City-Murray, UT $80,580 $98,400 $112,990 2,010
Albuquerque, NM $78,860 $98,220 $117,800 1,240
Tucson, AZ $76,610 $98,100 $119,930 910
Louisville/Jefferson County, KY-IN $76,190 $97,970 $130,240 2,340
Rochester, NY $79,940 $97,240 $126,550 910
Omaha, NE-IA $76,980 $96,310 $117,060 1,220
St. Louis, MO-IL $77,510 $96,290 $124,910 3,920
Oklahoma City, OK $76,070 $94,630 $118,090 1,730
Urban Honolulu, HI $76,780 $90,980 $108,230 1,470
Columbia, SC $64,720 $90,760 $119,990 2,110
Fort Wayne, IN $76,970 $90,300 $102,690 650
Baton Rouge, LA $74,470 $88,160 $106,700 920
Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY $69,240 $86,890 $106,440 3,290
Knoxville, TN $69,990 $85,730 $102,200 1,210
Lansing-East Lansing, MI $67,400 $84,870 $111,110 660
Cedar Rapids, IA $72,400 $81,510 $100,610 440
Boise City, ID $63,240 $81,280 $98,550 810
Tallahassee, FL $59,180 $72,510 $93,020 1,480

All occupations

Where these numbers come from

The pay figures on this page come from the US Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics wage series — payroll figures employers report from their own records, covering everyone working in the occupation rather than only those who happen to answer a poll. Nobody self-reported them, and no salary here was submitted by the person earning it.

What that does and does not tell you. These are earnings of people already in the job, not the pay advertised on current openings — and advertised pay tends to run above them. It is a sample of employers, not a count of all of them, so every figure is an estimate. The number beside each band is how many people work in the occupation in that area: it says how substantial the local workforce is, not how many employers were surveyed. And BLS publishes no margin of error for the percentiles — only for the employment count — so treat the median as a solid central figure rather than a precise one.

Where the second band comes from. Some pages also show what employers formally attest they will pay a sponsored worker, from H-1B Labor Condition Application disclosures. Those are real, filed, public wages and the employer is legally bound by them — but the population is only employers who sponsor work visas, which is neither everyone hiring for the role nor a random sample of them. Sponsorship concentrates in large, well-paying technology employers and in IT staffing firms that file toward the lower end, and we have not measured which effect wins. So it sits beside the earnings band, never averaged into it: there is no meaningful figure halfway between what a role pays and what a visa filing committed to.

What we deliberately do not show. Any area with fewer than 100 people in the occupation, or where the estimate is too thinly sampled to stand behind (current data: OEWS-May2025). And any trend or year-on-year change: we hold a single release, and drawing a line through one point would be inventing a finding. When a second lands the trend appears here, and not before.

This covers the pay figures on this page. For the postings, the AI extraction and the market estimates — and the full list of things we deliberately do not claim — see our methodology.